Indomethacin-Responsive Headache Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: This article describes the clinical features and treatment of the indomethacin-responsive headache disorders paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: Both paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua are treated with indomethacin at the lowest clinically useful dose. It has recently become clear that some patients with either condition may respond to treatment with noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation, which can be both indomethacin sparing and, in some cases, headache controlling. Given the lifelong nature of both paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua, brain imaging with MRI is recommended when the conditions are identified, specifically including pituitary views. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua are indomethacin-responsive headache disorders that offer a rewarding and unique opportunity to provide marked clinical improvement when recognized and treated appropriately. These disorders share the final common pathway of the trigeminal-autonomic reflex, with head pain and cranial autonomic features, and are differentiated pathophysiologically by the pattern of brain involvement, which can be seen using functional imaging. They have distinct differential diagnoses to which the clinician needs to remain alert.

Developing a Copper(II) Isopropyl 2-Pyridyl Ketone Thiosemicarbazone Compound Based on the IB Subdomain of Human Serum Albumin-Indomethacin Complex: Inhibiting Tumor Growth by Remodeling the Tumor Microenvironment.

To develop a next-generation metal agent and dual-agent multitargeted combination therapy, we developed a copper (Cu) compound based on the properties of the human serum albumin (HSA)-indomethacin (IND) complex to remodel the tumor microenvironment (TME). We optimized a series of Cu(II) isopropyl 2-pyridyl ketone thiosemicarbazone compounds to obtain a Cu(II) compound (C4) with significant cytotoxicity and then constructed an HSA-IND-C4 complex (HSA-IND-C4) delivery system. IND and C4 bind to the hydrophobic cavities of the IB and IIA domains of HSA, respectively. In vivo, the HSA-IND-C4 not only showed enhanced antitumor efficacy relative to C4 and C4 + IND but also improved their targeting ability and decreased their side effects. The antitumor mechanism of C4 + IND involved acting on the different components of the TME. IND inhibited tumor-related inflammation, while C4 not only induced apoptosis and autophagy of cancer cells but also inhibited tumor angiogenesis.

Melatonin in hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania.

BACKGROUND: Hemicrania continua (HC) and paroxysmal hemicrania (PH) belong to a group of primary headache disorders called trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. One of the diagnostic criteria for both HC and PH is the absolute response to the therapeutic dose of indomethacin. However, indomethacin is discontinued in many patients as a result of intolerance to its side effects. Melatonin, a pineal hormone, which shares similar chemical structure to indomethacin, has been reported to have some efficacy for HC in previous case reports and series. To our knowledge, there is no literature regarding the use of melatonin in PH. We aimed to describe the clinical use of melatonin in the preventive management of HC and PH. METHODS: Patient level data were extracted as an audit from routinely collected clinical records in consecutive patients seen in outpatient neurology clinic at King's College Hospital, London, UK, from September 2014 to April 2023. Our cohort of patients were identified through a search using the keywords: hemicrania continua, paroxysmal hemicrania, melatonin and indomethacin. Descriptive statistics including absolute and relative frequencies, mean ± SD, median and interquartile range (IQR) were used. RESULTS: Fifty-six HC patients were included with a mean ± SD age of 52 ± 16 years; 43 of 56 (77%) patients were female. Melatonin was taken by 23 (41%) patients. Of these 23 patients, 19 (83%) stopped indomethacin because of different side effects. The doses of melatonin used ranged from 0.5 mg to 21 mg, with a median dose of 10 mg (IQR = 6-13 mg). Fourteen (61%) patients reported positive relief for headache, whereas the remaining nine (39%) patients reported no headache preventive effect. None of the patients reported that they were completely pain free. Two patients continued indomethacin and melatonin concurrently for better symptom relief. Eight patients continued melatonin as the single preventive treatment. Side effects from melatonin were rare. Twenty-two PH patients were included with mean ± SD age of 50 ± 17 years; 17 of 22 (77%) patients were female. Melatonin was given to six (27%) patients. The median dose of melatonin used was 8 mg (IQR = 6-10 mg). Three (50%) patients responded to melatonin treatment. One of them used melatonin as adjunctive treatment with indomethacin. CONCLUSIONS: Melatonin showed some efficacy in the treatment of HC and PH with a well-tolerated side effect profile. It does not have the same absolute responsiveness as indomethacin, at the doses used, although it does offer a well-tolerated option that can have significant ameliorating effects in a substantial cohort of patients.

Bartter syndrome-like phenotype in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Bartter syndrome (BS) is a rare genetic tubulopathy affecting the loop of Henle leading to salt wasting. It is commonly seen in utero or in the early neonatal period. Rare cases of acquired BS are reported in association with infections like tuberculosis, granulomatous conditions like sarcoidosis, autoimmune diseases and drugs. The mainstay of management includes potassium, calcium and magnesium supplementation. We report the case of a woman in her 50s with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus for the last 10 years, who presented with diabetic foot ulcers and generalised weakness with ECG changes suggestive of hypokalaemia. She had severe hypokalaemia with high urine potassium excretion and hypochloraemic metabolic alkalosis. She poorly responded to intravenously administered potassium supplements and had persistent hypokalaemia. On further evaluation of the persistent hypokalaemia, a diagnosis of idiopathic Bartter-like phenotype was made. She responded well to tablet indomethacin and is presently asymptomatic and is being maintained on tablet indomethacin after 6 months of follow-up.

Neuropeptide W facilitates chronic gastric ulcer healing by the regulation of cyclooxygenase and NF-κB signaling pathways.

AIMS: Putative beneficial effects of neuropeptide W (NPW) in the early phase of gastric ulcer healing process and the involvement of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes were investigated in an acetic acid-induced gastric ulcer model. MAIN METHODS: In anesthetized male Sprague-Dawley rats, acetic acid was applied surgically on the serosa and then a COX-inhibitor (COX-2-selective NS-398, COX-1-selective ketorolac, or non-selective indomethacin; 2 mg/kg/day, 3 mg/kg/day or 5 mg/kg/day; respectively) or saline was injected intraperitoneally. One h after ulcer induction, omeprazole (20 mg/kg/day), NPW (0.1 µg/kg/day) or saline was intraperitoneally administered. Injections of NPW, COX-inhibitors, omeprazole or saline were continued for the following 2 days until rats were decapitated at the end of the third day. KEY FINDINGS: NPW treatment depressed gastric prostaglandin (PG) I2 level, but not PGE2 level. Similar to omeprazole, NPW treatment significantly reduced gastric and serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 beta levels and depressed the upregulation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and COX-2 expressions due to ulcer. In parallel with the histopathological findings, treatment with NPW suppressed ulcer-induced increases in myeloperoxidase activity and malondialdehyde level and replenished glutathione level. However, the inhibitory effect of NPW on myeloperoxidase activity and NPW-induced increase in glutathione were not observed in the presence of COX-1 inhibitor ketorolac or the non-selective COX-inhibitor indomethacin. SIGNIFICANCE: In conclusion, NPW facilitated the healing of gastric injury in rats via the inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine production, oxidative stress and neutrophil infiltration as well as the downregulation of COX-2 protein and NF-κB gene expressions.

Indomethacin with or without prophylactic pancreatic stent placement to prevent pancreatitis after ERCP: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of rectally administered indomethacin and placement of a prophylactic pancreatic stent is recommended to prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in high-risk patients. Preliminary evidence suggests that the use of indomethacin might eliminate or substantially reduce the need for stent placement, a technically complex, costly, and potentially harmful intervention. METHODS: In this randomised, non-inferiority trial conducted at 20 referral centres in the USA and Canada, patients (aged ≥18 years) at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive rectal indomethacin alone or the combination of indomethacin plus a prophylactic pancreatic stent. Patients, treating clinicians, and outcomes assessors were masked to study group assignment. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis. To declare non-inferiority, the upper bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference in post-ERCP pancreatitis (indomethacin alone minus indomethacin plus stent) would have to be less than 5% (non-inferiority margin) in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02476279), and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 17, 2015, and Jan 25, 2023, a total of 1950 patients were randomly assigned. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 145 (14·9%) of 975 patients in the indomethacin alone group and in 110 (11·3%) of 975 in the indomethacin plus stent group (risk difference 3·6%; 95% CI 0·6-6·6; p=0·18 for non-inferiority). A post-hoc intention-to-treat analysis of the risk difference between groups showed that indomethacin alone was inferior to the combination of indomethacin plus prophylactic stent (p=0·011). The relative benefit of stent placement was generally consistent across study subgroups but appeared more prominent among patients at highest risk for pancreatitis. Safety outcomes (serious adverse events, intensive care unit admission, and hospital length of stay) did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: For preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients, a strategy of indomethacin alone was not as effective as a strategy of indomethacin plus prophylactic pancreatic stent placement. These results support prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in addition to rectal indomethacin administration in high-risk patients, in accordance with clinical practice guidelines. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.

NSAIDs do not reduce severity among post-ERCP pancreatitis patients.

OBJECTIVE: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most studied chemoprophylaxis for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP). While previous systematic reviews have shown NSAIDs reduce PEP, their impact on moderate to severe PEP (MSPEP) is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the impact of NSAIDs on MSPEP among patients who developed PEP. We later surveyed physicians' understanding of that impact. DESIGN: A systematic search for randomized trials using NSAIDs for PEP prevention was conducted. Pooled-prevalence and Odds-ratio of PEP, MSPEP were compared between treated vs. control groups. Analysis was performed using R software. Random-effects model was used for all variables. Physicians were surveyed via email before and after reviewing our results. RESULTS: 7688 patients in 25 trials were included. PEP was significantly reduced to 0.598 (95%CI, 0.47-0.76) in the NSAIDs group. Overall burden of MSPEP was reduced among all patients undergoing ERCP: OR 0.59 (95%CI, 0.42-0.83). However, NSAIDs didn't affect the proportion of MSPEP among those who developed PEP (p = 0.658). Rectal Indomethacin and diclofenac reduced PEP but not MSPEP. Efficacy didn't vary by risk, timing of administration, or bias-risk. Survey revealed a change in the impression of the effect of NSAIDs on MSPEP after reviewing our results. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal diclofenac or indomethacin before or after ERCP reduce the overall burden of MSPEP by reducing the pool of PEP from which it can arise. However, the proportion of MSPEP among patients who developed PEP is unaffected. Therefore, NSAIDs prevent initiation of PEP, but do not affect severity among those that develop PEP. Alternative modalities are needed to reduce MSPEP among patients who develop PEP.

Two cases of infancy associated eosinophilic pustular folliculitis (I-EPF) comparing the profile of infiltrating cells with classic EPF by immunohistochemical study.

Infancy associated eosinophilic pustular folliculitis (I-EPF) is a clinical variant of EPF that develops in childhood. Previous studies have suggested that I-EPF exhibits clinical and histological differences distinct from other variants, including classic EPF. Herein, we report two patients with I-EPF treated with topical indomethacin. These two cases exhibited less perifollicular and more perivascular eosinophilic infiltration, which is different in distribution from that of classic EPF. Immunohistochemical study demonstrated that the infiltrating mononuclear cells were CD4-dominant T cells in classic EPF and I-EPF, whereas the number of CD68-positive cells was significantly higher in classic EPF than in I-EPF. Immunohistochemical staining was also performed for eosinophilic pustular folliculitis (HPGDS), which has been reported to induce eosinophils and is a therapeutic target of indomethacin in classic EPF. HPGDS-positive cells were also observed in I-EPF, which may explain the effectiveness of topical indomethacin. Although clinical and histopathological features of I-EPF are different from other variants, the arachidonic acid pathway could be involved in eosinophil infiltration, not only in classic EPF but also in I-EPF.

Long-term effect of indomethacin on a rat model of neonatal hypoxia ischemic encephalopathy through behavioral tests.

BACKGROUND: Many medical experts prescribe indomethacin because of its anti-inflammatory, analgesic, tocolytic, and duct closure effects. This article presents an evaluation of the enduring impact of indomethacin on neonatal rats with hypoxic-ischemic (HI) insults, employing behavioral tests as a method of assessment. METHODS: The experiment was conducted on male Wistar-Albino rats weighing 10 to 15 g, aged between seven and 10 days. The rats were divided into three groups using a random allocation method as follows: hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) group, HIE treated with indomethacin group (INDO), and Sham group. A left common carotid artery ligation and hypoxia model was applied in both the HIE and INDO groups. The INDO group was treated with 4 mg/kg intraperitoneal indomethacin every 24 h for 3 days, while the Sham and HIE groups were given dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). After 72 h, five rats from each group were sacrificed and brain tissue samples were stained with 2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TCC) for infarct-volume measurement. Seven rats from each group were taken to the behavioral laboratory in the sixth postnatal week (PND42) and six from each group were sacrificed for the Evans blue (EB) experiment for blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity evaluation. The open field (OF) test and Morris water maze (MWM) tests were performed. After behavioral tests, brain tissue were obtained and stained with TCC to assess the infarct volume. RESULTS: The significant increase in the time spent in the central area and the frequency of crossing to the center in the INDO group compared with the HIE group indicated that indomethacin decreased anxiety-like behavior (p < 0.001, p < 0.05). However, the MWM test revealed that indomethacin did not positively affect learning and memory performance (p > 0.05). Additionally, indomethacin significantly reduced infarct volume and neuropathological grading in adolescence (p < 0.05), although not statistically significant in the early period. Moreover, the EB experiment demonstrated that indomethacin effectively increased BBB integrity (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we have shown for the first time that indomethacin treatment can reduce levels of anxiety-like behavior and enhance levels of exploratory behavior in a neonatal rat model with HIE. It is necessary to determine whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, such as indomethacin, should be used for adjuvant therapy in newborns with HIE.

Secular Trends in Patent Ductus Arteriosus Management in Infants Born Preterm in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.

We evaluated changes in patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) diagnosis and treatment from 2012 through 2021 in a network of US academic hospitals. PDA treatment decreased among infants born at 26-28 weeks but not among infants born at 22-25 weeks. Rates of indomethacin use and PDA ligation decreased while acetaminophen use and transcatheter PDA closure increased.

Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Technologically Processed Antibodies to the Molecules of the Major Histocompatibility Complex in a Model of Acute Inflammation In Vivo.

The anti-inflammatory effect of technologically processed antibodies (TPA) to immune targets (MHC I and MHC II) was assessed in the carrageenan-induced rat paw edema model. The parameters "increase in edema" and "suppression of edema" significantly decreased (p<0.05) against the background of treatment with TPA and the reference drug indomethacin compared to the placebo group. The tested TPA produced an anti-inflammatory effect.

Long-Term Indomethacin Treatment in a Chinese Child with Gitelman Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review on its Efficacy and Tolerance.

BACKGROUND Gitelman syndrome (GS) is a rare inherited autosomal recessive salt-losing renal tubulopathy. Early-onset GS is difficult to differentiate from Bartter syndrome (BS). It has been reported in some cases that cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors, which pharmacologically reduce prostaglandin E2(PGE2) synthesis, are helpful for GS patients, especially in children, but the long-term therapeutic effect has not yet been revealed. CASE REPORT A 4-year-old boy was first brought to our hospital for the chief concern of short stature and growth retardation. Biochemical tests demonstrated severe hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis. The patient's serum magnesium was normal. He was diagnosed with BS and treated with potassium supplementation and indomethacin and achieved stable serum potassium levels and slow catch-up growth. At 11.8 years of age, the patient showed hypomagnesemia and a genetic test confirmed that he had GS with compound heterozygous mutations in the SLC12A3 gene. At the age of 14.8 years, when indomethacin had been taken for nearly 10 years, the boy reported having chronic stomachache, while his renal function remained normal. After proton pump inhibitor and acid inhibitor therapy, the patient's symptoms were ameliorated, and he continued to take a low dose of indomethacin (37.5 mg/d divided tid) with good tolerance. CONCLUSIONS Early-onset GS in childhood can be initially misdiagnosed as BS, and gene detection can confirm the final diagnosis. COX inhibitors, such as indomethacin, might be tolerated by pediatric patients, and long-term therapy can improve the hypokalemia and growth retardation without significant adverse effects.

Indometacina como tratamiento de granuloma eosinófilo multifocal / Indomethacin as a treatment for multifocal Eosinophilic granuloma

Granuloma eosinófilo es la variante más frecuente de histiocitosis de células de Langerhans. La mayoría de las lesiones ocurren en cráneo, costillas, columna vertebral o huesos largos, y pueden ser únicas o múltiples. El tratamiento depende del lugar de la afectación y del número de lesiones. Las opciones terapéuticas incluyen un agente único con prednisona, la combinación de vinblastina y prednisona, curetaje de las lesiones óseas o instilación intralesional de esteroides. Indometacina parece ser efectiva como tratamiento de lesiones de histiocitosis de células de Langerhans del hueso en niños y es bien tolerada. Presentamos el caso de un paciente varón de 4 años de edad con afectación de 2 huesos del cuerpo, cráneo y vértebra, tratado con curetaje de la lesión craneal e indometacina oral durante 19 meses, con completa curación de las lesiones y sin recurrencia 4 meses después de suspenderla. Concluimos que indometacina parece ser efectiva en el tratamiento de lesiones óseas de histiocitosis de células de Langerhans en niños, evitando otras terapias más agresivas. (AU)

Eosinophilic granuloma of the bone is the most common variant of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Most of the lesions occur in the skull, ribs, spine or long bones and may be single or multiple. Therapy is generally chosen based on the site involved and the number of lesions. Treatment options include single agent with prednisone, the combination of vinblastine and prednisone, curettage of bone lesions or intralesional steroids injection. Indomethacin seems to be effective in treating isolated Langerhans cell histiocytosis of the bone in children and is generally well-tolerated. We present the case of a 4-year-old boy with involvement of 2 bones, skull and vertebra, treated with curettage of the skull and indomethacin for 19 months. There was complete healing of the lesions at the end of the treatment and no evidence of recurrence 4 months post-treatment. We conclude that indomethacin seems to be effective in the treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis of the bone in children, avoiding more aggressive therapies. (AU)

The ratio of M1 to M2 microglia in the striatum determines the severity of L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias.

L-Dopa, while treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, can lead to debilitating L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias, limiting its use. To investigate the causative relationship between neuro-inflammation and dyskinesias, we assessed if striatal M1 and M2 microglia numbers correlated with dyskinesia severity and whether the anti-inflammatories, minocycline and indomethacin, reverse these numbers and mitigate against dyskinesia. In 6-OHDA lesioned mice, we used stereology to assess numbers of striatal M1 and M2 microglia populations in non-lesioned (naïve) and lesioned mice that either received no L-Dopa (PD), remained non-dyskinetic even after L-Dopa (non-LID) or became dyskinetic after L-Dopa treatment (LID). We also assessed the effect of minocycline/indomethacin treatment on striatal M1 and M2 microglia and its anti-dyskinetic potential via AIMs scoring. We report that L-Dopa treatment leading to LIDs exacerbates activated microglia numbers beyond that associated with the PD state; the severity of LIDs is strongly correlated to the ratio of the striatal M1 to M2 microglial numbers; in non-dyskinetic mice, there is no M1/M2 microglia ratio increase above that seen in PD mice; and reducing M1/M2 microglia ratio using anti-inflammatories is anti-dyskinetic. Parkinson's disease is associated with increased inflammation, but this is insufficient to underpin dyskinesia. Given that L-Dopa-treated non-LID mice show the same ratio of M1/M2 microglia as PD mice that received no L-Dopa, and, given minocycline/indomethacin reduces both the ratio of M1/M2 microglia and dyskinesia severity, our data suggest the increased microglial M1/M2 ratio that occurs following L-Dopa treatment is a contributing cause of dyskinesias.

Efficacy of ibuprofen and indomethacin as prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification: a comparative study.

The prophylactic action of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in heterotopic ossification (HO) was first described following analgesic therapy with indomethacin. Following that evidence, several compounds have been successfully used for prophylaxes of HO. Ibuprofen has been also proposed for the prevention of HO following THA. The present study compared the administration of ibuprofen for three weeks versus indomethacin as prophylaxis for HO following primary THA. In all THA procedures, pre- and post-operative protocols were conducted in a highly standardized fashion. The type of HO prophylaxis (indomethacin 100 mg/daily or ibuprofen 100 mg/daily) was chosen according to a chronological criterion: from 2017 to 2019 indomethacin was used, whereas from 2019 to 2022 ibuprofen was administered. In case of allergy or intolerance to NSAIDs, no prophylaxis was performed, and patients were included as a control group. All patients who underwent an anteroposterior radiography of the pelvis at a minimum of 12 months following THA were considered for inclusion. On admission, the age and sex of the patients were recorded. Moreover, the causes of osteoarthritis and the date of surgery were recorded. The grade of HO was assigned by a blinded assessor who was not involved in the clinical management of the patients. The modified Brooker Staging System was used to rate the efficacy of the interventions. Data from 1248 patients were collected. 62% (767 of 1248 patients) were women. The mean age was 67.0 ± 2.9 years. The mean follow-up was 21.1 ± 10.8 months. In the ibuprofen group, 73% of patients evidenced Brooker 0, 17% Brooker I, and 10% Brooker II. In the indomethacin group, 77% of patients evidenced Brooker 0, 16% Brooker I, 6% Brooker II. No patient in the ibuprofen and indomethacin group developed Brooker III or IV. In the control group, 64% of patients evidenced Brooker 0, 21% Brooker I, 3% Brooker II, and 12% Brooker III. No patient in the control group developed Brooker IV HO. Concluding, three weeks of administration of ibuprofen demonstrated similar efficacy to indomethacin in preventing HO following primary THA. The prophylaxis with ibuprofen or indomethacin was more effective in preventing HO compared to a control group who did not receive any pharmacological prophylaxis.

Paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua: Review on pathophysiology, clinical features and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua are indometacin-sensitive trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, a terminology which reflects the predominant distribution of the pain, observable cranial autonomic features and shared pathophysiology. Understanding the latter is limited, both by low prevalence and the intricacies of studying brain function, requiring multimodal techniques to glean insights into such disorders. Similarly obscure is the curious response to indometacin. This review will address what is currently known about pathophysiology, the rationale for the current classification and, features which may confound the diagnosis, such as lack of cranial autonomic symptoms and those which are typically associated with migraine such as nausea, photophobia, phonophobia and aura. Despite these characteristics, a dramatic response to indometacin, which is not seen in migraine nor the other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias , provides the hallmark of the diagnosis. The main clinical differential for paroxysmal hemicrania is based on temporal pattern and lies between cluster headache and short-lasting-neuralgiform headache attacks with tearing or additional cranial autonomic symptoms. For hemicrania continua it is more challenging as the main differential for which the disorder is often treated is migraine. A prior episodic pattern, often days at a time, and the tendency to exacerbation with analgesics will further deflect from the diagnosis. The relevance of this is that there is little overlap in therapeutics between paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua and other headache disorders and there are limited effective alternatives to indometacin. The most effective are other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including the newer COX-II inhibitors. Even though early reports suggest that a higher indometacin dose-requirement may herald a secondary precipitating pathology, this does not seem to be the case, with syndrome and response to treatment being similar with the primary disorder. In this context imaging of new onset paroxysmal hemicrania or hemicrania continua and implication of the results will be discussed as will alternative treatment options.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment of cancer cachexia: A systematic review.

Cancer cachexia (CC) is a multifactorial syndrome driven by inflammation, defined by ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass (with or without loss of fat mass) that cannot be fully reversed by conventional nutritional support. CC leads to progressive functional impairment, with its clinical management complicated and limited therapeutic options available. The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on patient-centred outcomes in patients with CC. In 2013, two systematic reviews concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend NSAIDs for clinical management of CC outside of clinical trials. However, clinical trials of multi-component CC interventions have included NSAIDs as an intervention component, so an up-to-date assessment of the evidence for NSAIDs in the treatment of CC is warranted. Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CINAHL) and three trial registers (clinicaltrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and ISRCTN) were searched on 16 December 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any NSAID (any dose or duration) with a control arm, in adult patients with CC, reporting measures of body weight, body composition, nutrition impact symptoms, inflammation, physical function or fatigue, were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes (determined with patient involvement) were survival, changes in muscle strength, body composition, body weight and quality of life. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Five studies were included, which investigated Indomethacin (n = 1), Ibuprofen (n = 1) and Celecoxib (n = 3). Four studies were judged to be at high risk of bias for all outcomes, with one study raising concerns for most outcomes. Considerable clinical and methodological heterogeneity amongst the studies meant that meta-analysis was not appropriate. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether Indomethacin or Ibuprofen is effective or safe for use in patients with CC; RCTs with lower risk of bias are needed. Celecoxib studies indicated it was safe for use in this population at the doses tested (200-400 mg/day) but found contrasting results regarding efficacy, potentially reflecting heterogeneity amongst the studies. There is inadequate evidence to recommend any NSAID for CC. While current clinical trials for CC treatments are shifting towards multi-component interventions, further research to determine the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs alone is necessary if they are to be included in such multi-component interventions. Furthermore, the lack of data on patient-determined primary outcomes in this review highlights the need for patient involvement in clinical trials for CC.

Hemicrania Continua: An Update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hemicrania Continua (HC) is a rare and disabling primary headache disorder that is characterized by persistent, unilateral headache with ipsilateral, cranial autonomic symptoms and restlessness or agitation. The diagnosis requires patients to experience an absolute response to therapeutic doses of indomethacin. RECENT FINDINGS: HC is diagnosed in in about 1.8% of adult patients who were evaluated for headache in tertiary care services, albeit this estimate should be interpreted with caution. The most prevalent accompanying symptoms appear to be lacrimation, conjunctival injection and restlessness or agitation. However, the available literature is limited by methodologic issues, and the current diagnostic criteria lack clarity on what defines absolute response to indomethacin. More rigorous studies are thus needed to improve our understanding of HC which, in turn, will facilitate better disease management in clinical practice. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of HC, including its epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and management.

Value of indomethacin suppository for preoperative analgesia and anti-inflammation in laparoscopic appendectomy: a protocol of prospective, double-blinded, single-centre, randomised controlled trial in China.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pain has always been a problem for patients and surgeons. Local inflammation, surgical trauma and pain in the body can cause a systemic stress response and immune imbalance, which can affect the patient's rapid recovery. Currently, most of the perioperative pain management is focused on the postoperative phase. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug indomethacin suppository has antipyretic and analgesic effects. This study will evaluate the value of indomethacin suppository for analgesia and anti-inflammation before laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-centre, double-blinded (clinician, assessor, data entry), randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 128 adult patients undergoing LA under emergency general anaesthesia with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) >2. The trial was divided into two groups (n=64) using a randomised number table: group A will be given 100 mg of indomethacin suppository rectally and group B will be given 8 mg of intravenous lornoxicam. The postoperative analgesic effect, inflammatory response and incidence of postoperative adverse effects will be compared. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and will be conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice. This trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University (2021-LHKY-123-02). We will disseminate our study findings at national and international paediatric research conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200062004).